IA. To recognise today the Right to exist of the Human that is destined to become.

(Protective version)

Consensus omnium (Proved by universal consent):

Every Human must be granted the Right to exist tomorrow. However, the recipient of this Right is not the one who is present before me today.‍

"Do you want to protect this girl's presence tomorrow? If so, who do you truly want to protect?"

The thought establishing the legal recognition of the Human to come is presented through a short dialogue:

A. The recognition of the Human Right to be here tomorrow (and live his/her moment of life to come).

I Want her to be here tomorrow > I recognise her Right to be here tomorrow

1: Presentation of the data:
- There is a girl in front of us today, and because she is alive and healthy, we can expect her to be here tomorrow, living a moment of her life.

- This is a fact.
2: Expression of Sensitivity for others:
-My question then to you is: Do you want this girl to be here tomorrow, living her moment of life to come?

- I certainly do! This girl has to be here tomorrow and live her moment of life to come!
3: Identification of a Right:
- For this purpose, you propose to protect - to legally protect - her presence tomorrow?

- Of course !

- Someone is legally protected on the basis of a Right. In the name of what Right would you protect this little girl to ensure that she is here tomorrow, living her moment of life to come?
‍
- Quite simply: in the name of her Right to be here tomorrow and live her moment of life to come.
‍
- It is today that you want to protect her presence tomorrow, so it is today that you recognise her this Right?

- Of course! I recognise that today, this girl has the Right to be here tomorrow (and to live her moment of life to come).
-

B. The Legal recognition of the Human to come.

I recognise her Right to be here tomorrow > I recognise the Right of the one she is destined to become to be.

4: Identification of the beneficiary of this Right:
- I have a second question for you.

- Please.

- Who, more specifically, is the beneficiary of this Right? Is this Right to be here tomorrow recognised for the one this girl is today or for the one she is destined to become tomorrow?

- Again, the answer is self-evident: This Right to be here tomorrow is granted to the one this little girl is destined to become tomorrow.

‍- You have just admitted the legal recognition of the Human to come.

- I cannot dispute this deduction!
-

Conclusion :

- Currently, only the Human who exists is legally recognised. Do you therefore acknowledge that this legal provision is flawed?

- Certainly! Having nothing to challenge in your intellectual reasoning, which relies solely on two questions whose answers are self-evident, I cannot deny that the law has always been misguided— that it has always had a too limited understanding of the Human who should be placed under its protection.

‍- The correct understanding of HL is therefore written as follows:
HL = H↓ + H→
H↓ (The Human who exists)

H→ (The Human to come)
- Certainly! In a few words, you have just compromised the Law on its most precious data.

Assessment:

"I Want today to protect your presence in the future.

But, when I speak of your presence in the future, I am not referring to the You of the present moment.

‍ The You I want to protect today is the You that extends into the future."

Once a legal data is identified, the question of its application arises:

> IIA
Follow us
YouTubeInstagramTwitter
© 2022 Copyright. Homme Droit