The Human under Law Recognition
(HL)

HD : Homme à reconnaître juridiquement

"Legal recognition must not be contingent upon the existence of the Human; legal recognition must enable the existence of the Human"

The Human that does not exist yet must exist in the eyes of the Law

The illustration refers to Themis, the goddess of Justice in Greek antiquity. Each scale represents a Human - both the one who exists today and the one who is to come - whom justice and the Law must consider to ensure that no one is denied legal recognition

The legal recognition of every Human is the fundamental principle of our modern societies inspired by humanism and today, Humanity is urged to understand that the Human who does not yet exist and is yet to come, must be legally recognised:

A. The Human who is destined to become tomorrow is already today to be legally recognised.

Accessing the Legal recognition of the Human who is yet to come by questioning the presence of others tomorrow:

read more

B. The Human who exists today was to be legally recognised yesterday (I).

Accessing the Legal recognition of the Human who is yet to come by questioning the act that would have deprived yesterday this Human of being here today:

- Yesterday, 10 years ago, an accident was averted. Would you have accepted that this young man was killed by that accident?

- Certainly not!

- And, why not?

- Otherwise, he would not be here today!

- So you recognise that 10 years ago, this young man had the Right to be here today?

‍- Indeed.

- However, 10 years ago, did this young man exist at that moment?

A. The Human that the embryo is destined to become tomorrow is already today to be legally recognised

From the case of the young girl to that of the embryo by questioning the other Human who is yet to come:

read more

B. The Human who exists today was to be legally recognised yesterday (II).

From the case of the young girl to that of the embryo by questioning the other act that would have deprived yesterday others of being here today:

- If this young man had the Right to be here today 10 years ago, would he not have had the same Right 11 years ago?

- Certainly! If someone is to be respected and protected, he must be treated as such at all times! The same person cannot be treated differently because of the given moment.

- And so, 15 years ago?

- Well, the same! At that moment, he was also to be recognised as having this Right!

- And 16, 17, 20, 21 years ago?

- The same!

- However, 21 years ago, this young man was only an embryo.

A. The protection of the embryo depends on what it is.

Currently, the Human to be protected corresponds to the Human that exists. So, in the case of the embryo, attention is only paid to the embryo that exists, and the question is:

"Is the embryo someone?"

read more

B. The protection of the embryo depends on the Human it is destined to become tomorrow.

Once the value of the Human to come is understood, no further questions arise; everyone understands that the embryo must be preserved because:

"Tomorrow, the embryo is someone!"

read more

Synthesis :

Asserting the existence of a Right and then determining which Human is to be protected under that Right:

Girl's case:

1*: Expression of Sensitivity for others (Part I):

Initial question:
"Do you want her to be here tomorrow?"
Answer:
"I surely do! This girl has to be here tomorrow!"

2*: Identification of a Right (Part I):

"I recognise this girl as having the Right to be here tomorrow!"

3*: Identification of the beneficiary of this Right (Part I):

"I recognise the One this girl is destined to be as having the Right to be here tomorrow!"

Embryo's case:

4*: Transposition of the identified Right to this specific case (Part II):

"I recognise the One the embryo is destined to be as having the Right to be here tomorrow!"

5*: The new obligation arising from the identified Right (Part III):

"I recognise the protection of the embryo because of the Right to be of the One that the embryo is destined to be!"

Annexes

The legal personality has to be attributed to the One to come.

Is the crown of flowers placed on the head of every Human? Are all Humans anointed today ? Are none missing, and can the laurel of peace truly be raised ? We believe so, but it is not the case if the crown is also to be placed on the head of the One to come.

READ more

The new Right to Life.

There is the vessel and the vessel is not destroyed because of the water in it, for it is the water that is precious. The Human subject of the Right to Life has always been misunderstood.

reAD more

Original work (the new Understanding of the Right to Life and its beneficiary)

In the name of this Right, it is the presence of this child along this path that is to be protected. However, is this child limited to the one he is today that we find all along this path?

PDF

Assessment:

This child is the reality of tomorrow. This is her face. However, since this child is not a reality today, we believe that this child doesn't deserve any consideration.

Except that we hadn't understood that the one we consider in every Human is not only the reality that he/she is today, but also the reality that he/she is going to be tomorrow!"

De lege feranda
(the law that must be)

To accept the premise that the Human whose presence we desire tomorrow is the one who is yet to come implies that we must recognise that every Human who is to come has the Right to be here tomorrow.

Therefore, it becomes the responsibility of each individual to ensure that this Right of the Human to come is upheld, and to take necessary action to restore this Right.

You think that only your son has the right to walk on this beach tomorrow. You are mistaken. Your daughter has this Right too.